If you were born between 1971 and 1995, your chances of attending a top school are…
> 9 times higher if you belong to the nobility
> 25 times higher if you are parisian
> 83 times higher if your father himself went to a great school
> 365 times higher if your father went to the same high school
For the generation born between 1966 and 1990, the chances of attending the same high school as their father are…
> 70 times higher for Science-Po
> 100 times higher for business schools
> 130 times higher for technical schools
> 270 times higher for ENA and ENS
Compared to the average, admission to the Grandes Ecoles of children of graduates of the Grandes Ecoles…
> 154 times bigger for the generation 1891-1915
> 81 times bigger for the generation 1916-1940
> 72 times bigger for the generation 1941-1965
> 75 times bigger for the 1966-1990 generation
Do the Grandes Ecoles perpetuate inequalities? Yes, confirms with supporting figures the economist Stéphane Benveniste in his thesis “Les Grandes Écoles in the XXe century. The field of the French elites: social reproduction, dynasties, networks”, defended in December 2021 and awarded the prize for the thesis in economics 2022. Far from it, the French have, at Sciences-Po, an Ecole Normale Supérieure (ENS) or even the National School of Administration (ENA). Thus, a Parisian is 25 times more likely to gain entry to the Grandes Ecoles, compared to 9.3 to 12.6 times more for cohorts (the term denotes an age group according to the year of birth) born before 1965. nobility, even two centuries after the Revolution, keep weighing: a little bit of blue blood gives you 9 times more chance of being absorbed into exceptional formations. However, the influence of the aristocracy is declining – at the beginning of the XXe century, it could provide 15 times more opportunities to join the elite, especially in political science and high administration schools. The most important factor remains social reproduction: Depending on the age group, a father who has gone to high school gives his child 72 to 154 times more chances to do the same. This genealogy bonus can give 450 times more chances in case the descendant goes to the same school as his father. By logical training, these forms of school dynasties do not only relate to direct ascendants: a grandchild or great-grandchild is therefore 30 to 54 times more likely to attend a large school if one of his ancestors also did. The theorems developed by Pierre Bourdieu in the state nobility (1989) don’t seem to have aged a bit: “As such, we must try to grasp the field of the grandes écoles, whose functioning as a structure contributes to the reproduction of the structure of the social space and the structure of the power field. † Enter into the great schools those who through their privileged education have received the codes, which they in turn will pass on to their descendants.
on the same topic
Emmanuel Bourdieu: a tendency to pursue the absolute
Author of “The Man Who Hates Himself”, directed by Denis Podalydès at the Théâtre de Chaillot until February 28, Emmanuel Bourdieu explores the path of a philosophy professor haunted by the quest for the absolute. The son of the sociologist Pierre Bourdieu, this writer and director, a student of Wittgenstein, explores the intricacies of language and thought, sympathizing with all characters who “sincerely believe” and give themselves wholeheartedly to their ideas.
Paul Pasquali: “meritocracy is the prerogative of heirs”
‘Heritocracy’ is not just a way to trace the history of the political struggle that allows the upper classes to perpetuate themselves. This concept invites us to break with a classistic, restrictive, and falsely consensual view of merit based on academic achievement. Interview with a specialist in social mobility: Paul Pasquali, sociology research fellow at the CNRS and author of the book Héritocratie. The elites, the great schools and the setbacks of merit (1870-2020) (La Découverte, 2021).
Bourdieu on a platter
By turning Pierre Bourdieu’s reflection into a spectacle, director Guillermo Pisani pays tribute to the sociologist while spotlighting the social determinisms that drive us to act.
Hourya Bentouhami, Philippe Raynaud. Do you earn or inherit?
Both studied in a large school, Normal Sup. However, everything opposes Hourya Bentouhami, who claims feminist and postcolonial studies, and Philippe Raynaud, political philosopher of liberal inspiration, when asked about the French model of meritocracy or about “positive discrimination”.
The fantastic fate of a class defector turned academic
No one ever comes out of nowhere unless this nowhere is the object of visceral rejection, conscious or not. Because this “nowhere” remains a social space that we never really get rid of. The sociologist Pierre Bourdieu spoke of ‘split habitus’ in his books, including Sketch for a self-analysis (2004), where he returned to his own journey (son of a postman from Béarn who became a professor at the College de France). In Without class or place (PUF, 2022), Norbert Alter also returns to his personal itinerary, symbolic of what Chantal Jacquet calls the ‘transclasses’ condition.
“The Great and Fabulous History of Commerce”: Sociological and Philosophical Fresco
Shows and peddlers, a myriad of societies interspersed with intimate stories: “La Grande et Fabuleuse Histoire du commerce”, by Joël Pommerat, undertakes an epic, sociological and philosophical dive into the wonderful universe of door-to-door sales. A world in miniature, ours, on display at the Bouffes du Nord until November 16, 2013.
Heredity, dividing line between humans and animals?
The issue of inheritance is central to the presidential campaign. Traditionally associated with political issues, it can also be considered from a more ontological point of view. What if heritage fundamentally differentiated us from animals? This dissertation is tempting, but may not cover all the complexities of the debate about the distinction between heredity and inheritance. Explanation.
The candidacy of Bourdieu and Coluche
Comedy’s sensational — and eventually cut short — entry into the race for presidential elections in 1980 provoked many reactions, including that of the sociologist Pierre Bourdieu, who saw in it the application of his concept of the political field.